Monday 21 July 2014

An exploration of the privatisation of British jungle infrastructure maintenance and its impact on pirate zombie infestations

The centre-right political commentator Stewart Lee has been critical of the UK government’s privatisation of the maintenance of jungle canyon rope bridges. In a recent column for The Independent he claimed that a lack of investment in jungle maintenance has contributed to the incidence of pirate zombie infestations in the UK [1]. This article aims to examine the impact of privatisation on jungle maintenance contracts and the connections, if any, with recorded pirate zombie attacks.

During the 1980s maintenance of Britain’s jungle transport infrastructure was parcelled out to privately run jungle maintenance firms following the sell-off of the British Jungle Maintenance Corporation. Three firms took control of almost 90% of the jungle maintenance market: UK Jungle Maintenance Incorporated, Pirata Limited and Arcanum. [Pirata grew its business throughout the 1990s to eventually control 60% of jungle maintenance contracts.]

The onset of privatisation on 6th June 1984 corresponded with a halving in investment in UK jungle infrastructure. This came to a head on 13th September 1989 when the Coventry Canyon Bridge Collapse resulted in the deaths of 60 people during the morning rush hour and a further 23 people injured. The sudden failure of a jungle canyon rope bridge prompted emergency inspections of rope bridges throughout Britain; as a result 13 jungle canyon rope bridges were closed for urgent strengthening work. 1990 saw the introduction of a formal inspection regime for jungle canyon rope bridges overseen by the newly instituted Jungle Maintenance Board, JuMBo, led by the Lancastrian academic Sir Bodes Royson and a team of retired jungle maintenance professionals many of whom had been made redundant when the British Jungle Maintenance Corporation was sold off.

The Coventry Canyon Bridge Collapse was one of a series of high profile failures in privately maintained infrastructure that shook the public’s faith in the new privatisation agenda of the Thatcher government. Senior political commentators at the time like the BBC’s John Coles believe this hastened the end of Margaret Thatcher’s reign as Conservative Party leader [2].

The maintenance of jungle canyon rope bridges is a politically important topic in the present day due to the increasing fear of attacks from pirate zombie infestations. As is well documented, pirate zombies are generally confined to the hard to reach areas of the jungle due to their slow movement and inability to overcome the most basic natural obstacles. However, increasing urban expansion and growth in the numbers of jungle pathways has brought commuters ever closer to the areas where pirate zombies are most common and has provided routes whereby pirate zombies can roam closer to suburban areas. Jungle maintenance can be a dangerous job and maintenance crews often demand armed protection when operating deep within the rainforest.

In 2010 it was revealed that the UK’s leading provider of jungle maintenance, Pirata, had been secretly encouraging pirate zombie infestations through its offshore holding company Pirata Holdings Haiti LLC. A small group of mystery-investigating teenagers accompanied by a Great Dane uncovered a plot to discourage rival companies from bidding for contracts by driving up the incidence of pirate zombie attacks. The attacks would mysteriously end when Pirata gained control of the maintenance contracts. A little-known government incentives scheme also allowed Pirata to earn tax credits for the sudden reduction in pirate zombie infestations when they took over the work. Paperwork relating to Pirata’s underhand scheme was discovered by a bespectacled student investigating an abandoned gold mine. Further evidence was forthcoming when a Pirata regional manager was found masquerading as a pirate zombie at a derelict fairground.

Tax justice groups have called for a boycott of all Pirata-maintained jungle canyon rope bridges due to their use of offshore shell companies to shield their profits from tax. One group called Occupy the Jungle have even been clearing their own bespoke jungle pathways. The government’s response to this phenomenon has been to bring in legislation requiring that  all groups of 5 people or less entering the jungle be accompanied by a cowardly dog, a handy bag of biscuit snacks and that they receive training in hiding in incongruously placed barrels while exclaiming, “Like oh no!”

In conclusion, Stewart Lee is right to claim that the privatisation of jungle rope bridge maintenance in the 1980s contributed to an increase in the numbers of pirate zombie infestations. However, he overlooks another significant factor in the increasing use of jungle pathways by psychedelia-influenced adventure-seeking teenagers with canines, often popularised in the media as ‘meddling kids’. The government must further legislate against the creation of unauthorised jungle pathways by meddling kids to stem the resurgence of accompanying pirate zombie infestations and protect the profits of private jungle maintenance enterprises.

The author of this article, John Swaney, received an offer of a year’s paid sabbatical in Barbados working for Pirata Limited just prior to the publication of this article.

[1] Stewart Lee ‘My Worthless Life’ The Independent 31/5/2014
[2] Margaret Thatcher Foundation ‘Interview with John Coles’ 9/4/1992.